I don’t know if it’s an age group thing or a northern thing, but round here I keep hearing people referring to having an appointment with a consultant
as ’seeing the specialist.’ It’s usually said in hushed tones. If you’re ’seeing the specialist’ there’s cause for concern. And the specialist will know, whereas you don’t. After all, that’s why they’re the specialist.
I was given a leaflet for a conference this week on urban mission. During the conference, you get put in a ’stream’ for your area of mission. You meet other people in similar situations and, wait for it, you’ll ‘hear from specialists across the UK about what God is saying to them.’ I especially like the last bit! So you’re in that stream because you’re in that particular area of urban mission but you’re not a specialist and God obviously doesn’t talk to you. I had a similar experience today at another church event. We had a presentation on mission, not by a specialist but by an advisor (same difference?). Then we had group discussion. But instead of the normal feedback from the groups, we had a panel of specialists instead who we could ask questions.
A very important part of a session with a medical specialist is the pictures. One may show the breaks in a damaged bone. Another might reveal an unwelcome mass. The cover of the leaflet has Jesus (or is it a specialist!) bursting onto a stage with the city falling apart all around him. At the church event, were told there are now two ‘economies’ when it comes to mission – parish church (or ‘inherited church’ ) and ‘fresh expression’. No less than the Archbishop of Canterbury has said this – the specialists’ specialist! This was portrayed in the presentation by two identically suited males dancing towards the sea. I deduce from this that mission is fun, that it may involve getting wet and even out of your depth and that the two economies are 50-50.
Finally, the specialist will prescribe, hopefully, a course of treatment. At the conference, there’s your stream. At the church gathering, we were told there would be ‘leading your church into growth’ for those in the inherited church economy; whilst the fresh expressers had ‘mission shaped church’ to do.
I’ve a bit of a phobia when it comes to doctors, but nevertheless if I get sent to see a specialist I will go. I will view the pictures carefully and take the course I’m given, though I understand nowadays that there may be a choice. But when it comes to matters of faith, do I need a specialist? Is it not rather that we are all learners and any of us can help the other along the way? And isn’t that so much better than a course? And doesn’t every picture tell a story? - which is why I knew I wouldn’t be going on the conference before I ever opened and read the text. Because you don’t reach a city from a stage.
Mind you, we have got a good programme (not a ‘course’!) on offer currently at St John’s here in Great Horton, Bradford!! School of Mission! Altogether better, because it’s about principles rather than ‘how to’ and is based on that superb book ‘The Shaping of Things to Come’. The next session’s on Saturday 5 December. No leaflet. No specialists. Just turn up. 9.30am to 12.30pm.